Tag Archive

Could this really be the day? Could this be the day that Massachusetts strikes through a department name that shocked me when I moved to this state? The wording in the Senate budget amendment would indicate that it is, and the joint committee that gets the budget next is not likely to change “Department of Developmental Services” back to its present name. It has been years that Massachusetts advocates have been working to change the name, and it seems that this will be the year.

The Department of Mental Retardation.

I thought that sort of name had gone the way of the institutions… Unfortunately, we still have those, too, in Massachusetts.

Mental retardation.

My son has this diagnosis along with autism. Those clinical diagnoses jump around when no one can find a clear explanation for why a person is not like everyone else. “Mental retardation” is a name I have mostly avoided using, largely because of its highly presumptive and predictive quality. “Developmental disability” seems to allow for more latitude, more possibilities. And I really prefer to refer to his abilities, rather than his disabilities, even on the most challenging days.

Beyond my own son, who does qualify for DMR’s minimal services no matter the name of the department, I wonder if a name change might not highlight the growing need for the forgotten developmental disabilities in the Commonwealth. Our own DMR houses the Division of Autism, which should serve all individuals on the autism spectrum, not just those who fit into DMR’s eligibility requirements, which are largely based on IQ, more stringently so for adults. There are a good number of people who have developmental disabilities who do not have IQs under 70. So who serves them? The Department of Mental Health sees “Asperger’s syndrome,” and hands fly up in the air: “That’s not ours! To DMR with you! Away!” Even those with multiple mental health diagnoses get pinned with an autism spectrum disorder, and DMH flies away. But right now, DMR does not provide services to individuals with Asperger’s syndrome, either.

Of course, the issue is really one of funding, and that rant is yet to come. Some who opposed the name change point to that very issue of funding, and the sympathy that the term “mental retardation” inspires. My son has been the special education mascot once or twice in his life, and I found those moments to be ones of circus-like shame. Perhaps the notion of “those poor people” inspires some guilt-ridden legislative line items, but does it inspire understanding and real systems change? Does it give people real lives, or does it perpetuate the fear? Not to say that funding is not important: I imagine that if the well had not run dry, DMH or DMR (DDS?) in this day and age would happily ensure that all people with disabilities get what they so desperately need. They would coordinate services rather than playing ping-pong to maintain a barely manageable caseload. I truly believe that every person who works for these agencies wants nothing more than to be able to provide appropriate services.

But lest I let these dreams of coordinated case management and appropriate services fly away with my point, let me get back to the very basic problem with a name like “Department of Mental Retardation.”

My son, with a diagnosis of “severe mental retardation” should, by definition, not gain cognitive abilities above those of a four year old.

How the hell does anyone know that?

And yet, with that prescription, who will ever help him to realize his potential, and not those of a clinical diagnosis?

Does a name mean anything? Oh yes. Sticks and stones have far less power.

A name means everything. And perhaps, this year in Massachusetts, a name will mean NOT keeping people in their place, but supporting their development. Maybe, just maybe, a name will mean change.

In a few short moments, the three kids and I will head out to Dairy Queen. It is a treat, to be sure, but symbolically it is an attempt to salvage a little joy from this weekend. I really don’t care about ice cream tonight; I just want to leave the house and have some feeling of being a happy family.

I have come to realize that the same issues that made me give up custody of my son with developmental disabilities in August are the same that may make it impossible for me to take him overnight at all. Those issues all revolve around one thing, and that one thing is perhaps the most damning defining moment for a person with a disability.

That one thing is another person. It is absolutely necessary to have more than one adult to take care of my son at any given time. This does not require a mere warm body. To help, the person needs to be vigilant about safety issues, but also patient enough to withstand a bite, a grab, a few solid hours of changing pants if his tummy is upset, or sitting outside his room on a wild night that he cannot fall asleep. It takes a person who will show up at the times that are likely to be challenging, and show up reliably. It takes a person who doesn’t mind the other kids and the holes in the wall, the clutter everywhere (which would be less of an issue with more help). It takes a strong person, who can help me get him out of harm’s way if he flops on the ground—sometimes inconveniently—and refuses to move, a person who can do this all with a smile, and some degree of understanding. It takes a kind person. It takes a person who will be all those things for the going state rate of $10.84 per hour… well, assuming that my son’s present custodian reapplies him for the MassHealth benefits that pay it.

Last year, when I was the custodial parent and called the shots, I was offered an opportunity to return to school in a prestigious disability program. I would never have attempted a demanding fellowship if I had not been incredibly lucky at first. A full-of-life, smart, loving young woman came from miles away to help me care for my son nearly everyday for several months. For her, as much as she liked us, it was a career move, and a good one at that. Life was good for all of us, and we laughed a lot, had fun. But it was inevitable that she had to move on to greener (and more lucrative) pastures when opportunity called.

Before she left, I started looking, and did not find in the six weeks I knew she was leaving. Within a short time, I was spending most of my time without children advertising the position in every thinkable way, then interviewing candidates. Some interesting people came into our lives for moments: a Harvard pre-med student, a part-time nanny who was working on a master’s in social work, a stately woman whose father had been killed by Idi Amin, and many, many more. Before finding help, I conducted thirty-two interviews, hired ten marvelous candidates (all of whom quit by the first day after coming for orientation), fired two (negligence does not even begin to describe..), and tried to write a grant for a project that would link college students and families of children with special needs. The project seemed doomed from the start in the midst of various regulations and other difficulties, not the least of which was the prospect of defining myself as a non-profit organization. It seemed a bit much. I sat in on organizational meetings around a state law that had been passed to address the problems with this workforce. As my studies progressed, I shaped my work around this issue, one that affects so many people. I was exhausted, and still had no answers, not even from the highest levels of state agencies. At last, months later, we finally found one person, a caring young lady who had known my son for several years. Relief…

After one difficult evening, though, she failed to show up for work the next day. She had hurt her back, she said in a message, and I called to see if she was all right. She never answered her phone, or email, to me again. The fallout was jarring to the kids, and to me. I advertised again, somewhat cynically realizing that the people who enter our home also enter our hearts. I started the quest again, but this time had no luck. Ultimately, I quit a job I had taken at the end of my fellowship, telling my supervisor through tears that I could not financially support my kids and care for them, too. And then, I made an even more difficult decision, the hardest thing… It was perhaps the only choice, but in so many ways it has always felt like the worst choice.

I gave up.

I realize that this statement goes against my happiest thoughts about my family, the ones like those I wrote several weeks ago, finding the joy in an ordinary day. The day I described there was an ordinary day… extraordinary, to be honest.

The truth is that there are moments that are hard, grueling, moments when the facts of toilet training deficiencies and behaviors resulting from nonverbal realities can bring me to my knees, literally.

I posted nothing here last week about Mother’s Day. Recovering from another back injury after a walk with my son, I was not in a joyous mood about the holiday, despite the efforts from all of my kids. They tried, as much as kids can; they really did. It was not my weekend to spend with them, and changing things around for a day never works very well; it is confusing, most of all to a child with autism. I have never had a bad back, but I cannot lift an obstinate 120 pounds, either.

It is moments like this that destroy the mother-child bond. I find myself less of a mother as I admit this, but I can feel it for days after something bad happens. I feel it in my recoiling when my son hugs me, my reluctance to endure another bite tearing me apart as I want to love him freely and without hesitation. Oh, I know he does it not out of cruelty, but out of frustration, in moments that his ears hurt, or that I failed to understand him, or that he just needed to feel that sensation for some reason I can only try to acknowledge.

Agencies across our Commonwealth, across the country, struggle with the lack of funding for people who have no voice, or a quiet one. Families besides mine are being ripped apart by lack of support, despite the best efforts from groups that lobby for the small legislative victories that lead to systems change. Maybe attitudes change along the way, and pave the way toward better times. But when money is tight and economic predictions are dire, altruism often takes the hit first.

There has to be a better way.

A few evenings ago, I heard a story—a funny one, as it was told—about a teenage boy’s mounting anxiety when faced with orders for a bloodletting… er, blood drawing. It could have been my kid.

Anyway, you all know how that routine goes. If you can go directly to the lab, it’s a lucky day! If your doctor is particularly kind and has the nurses in the office do it right then and there, the sun shines a special beam and birds sing. If, however, you have to go to the hospital, be prepared to wait, register, get the little bracelet put on after answering questions that range from your name and insurance company (what they really want to know) to what your preferred religion is. You sign swearing that you understand HIPAA (does anyone understand HIPAA?), and that you’ll pay your bill when all is said and done. They tell you that you are free to go to the lab, usually down several confusingly marked corridors. Then, at the lab, you wait again, probably with a number. If it’s a big hospital on a busy day, you may wait for hours.

Now, try doing that with an anxious kid. No, I don’t mean one who keeps tugging at you saying he’s bored and doesn’t want to be there. I mean one who is in real danger of being admitted because of the stress the whole ordeal is causing. You’ll know by the sweat, then the clammy cold hands and the quick breathing. Add some communication challenges, a little obsession, a little compulsion, and the entire waiting room is apt to have a meltdown right there with you.

So, as I heard the story of one boy’s total and complete breakdown through this ordeal, a thought came to mind. As difficult as the world is to navigate from a wheelchair, most people have some vague notion that places like hospital labs are supposed to be accessible to people who use them. If a lab is up any stairs, there is a ramp, or an elevator. If the rules say that patients have to sit in those chairs with the fold down tables attached so the phlebotomists can find veins more easily, the rules may bend a little so that the patient doesn’t have to move from a wheelchair. Accommodations can be made, and in fact, they have to be made, according to the Americans with Disabilities Act. It’s far from perfect, and it’s true that some people still don’t get it, but most people do at least acknowledge that the world is difficult for anyone who has a physical disability.

So why can’t we accommodate people who experience other sorts of disabilities? Waiting for a potentially painful procedure is traumatic for someone with severe, diagnosed anxiety. Isn’t this an accessibility issue, too?

Walt Disney World, I hear, has a special entrance to rides for kids with special needs, so they don’t have to wait through long lines that would make it impossible for them to be there otherwise. If you have ever waited in a line with a child who has autism, this service makes so much sense. It’s not favoritism anymore than a ramp is. It really is an issue of accessibility, and it really is the law. Amazing that Disney gets it, but a hospital doesn’t.

And besides, when someone is obviously struggling a lot, how much nicer would the world be if we could just bend rules enough—even when it’s not a legal matter—and think beyond our own experiences? How much better off would we all be, if only we could try to be kind just a little more often?

Last Thursday, my hair still wet from dodging the heavy snow as I rushed—late—into the courthouse, I was stopped still in a stairwell as my lawyer whispered back to me.

“You agree to it? You can live with that!?” she grabbed my arm. She had worked in this system for so many years, knew the world of developmental disabilities, of mental health, said that she thought I was doing the right thing. I trusted her. She would have said no before I ever got there if she had thought it was a bad idea—she knew me that well. My lawyer is not one to mince words to save my feelings, but after all this time I trusted her. I knew that she had always wanted what was right. More than that, I trusted myself, and I let go.

I was still nodding, barely breathing, then pacing back and forth, looking up at the high ceilings, the light coming in the windows near the top. My lawyer walked away from me, quickly across the hall, saying “Okay.” I had just agreed to give away my rights to make medical and educational decisions for one child, to have them for another. It was going to be okay. The choice that felt like a surrender to me, felt right. It would benefit everyone else. In other words, it was the only choice I could make.

“When I let go of what I am, I become what I might be” (Lao Tzu).

Who am I?

For years, I have been the mom of my son, not of the older one, and not of my daughters, but of my son with developmental disabilities. Oh sure, I am a mom to all four of the kids. I do the typical mom things, read stories, help with homework, shuttle kids around, volunteer at the school when I can. Sometimes more. I try. I have done what I could for all of them, but nothing compared to what I invested of myself in the life and times of my ten year old. For ten years, it is his mom who I have been.

It is a laudable job. Mother of child with special needs. Advocate (not any old parent, but one who stands up for her kid against the System). I found generous people—much more generous than I had known before. I found patience. I found purpose. It is a job I never wanted, though. I was an affable, word worshiping Europhile with grand visions of saving the world in other ways, increasing global understanding through languages and literature. My visions of motherhood involved exposing the kids at a young age to tapenade while on sabbatical in Provence, hiring theater-major babysitters who taught my kids Shakespearean scenes that I would make into productions for the neighborhood.

Well, I do still speak French, and I do still tutor from time to time. My daughters do love to go out on my balcony and yell, “Romeo, Romeo, please take out the trash” (where did they get that???). But my kids’ performances tend more toward High School Musical than Hamlet, and my ten year old? Well, he always loved the “Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow…” soliloquy from Macbeth. The popping sounds made him laugh—not really the effect they were supposed to have. But then, my ten year old never learned to talk.

I remember my suspicions when he was tiny. He was a good baby, smiled early, hardly ever cried, and he was beautiful. Not just cute, but angelic. Next to my older son, the one who tried my patience sorely (even as I tried not to laugh), the one who would later be diagnosed with bipolar disorder, he seemed a much-needed gift.

Still, something in his cry, when he did cry, broke my heart a little every time I heard it. I picked him up, feeling that he needed more of me than I had, and I had not even noticed until it was too late that he needed me at all. By the time my little boy actually called for me, it was as if he was not only fed up with waiting, but in pain. Looking back now, I think he was. I think it never occurred to him to do something to get my attention, only to cry in actual, physical pain. In the busy days with a toddler, I sometimes forgot that the baby had not asked to eat for hours. He didn’t reach for things, couldn’t pick up his head. He did not try to push up his head if I put him on his tummy—he just lay there until I saved him. At four months he still did not roll over. He was content to sit in his bouncy seat for hours, cooing at me enthusiastically when I sat beside him, but otherwise apparently happy alone. Everyone told me how lucky I was to have such an easygoing fellow, who could be passed quite easily from woman to woman at any given community function. I agreed, I was lucky, but it just didn’t feel quite right.

I have come to hate the “What to Expect…” books. They make it sound as though everything is always going to be all right, and line up lists of normal milestones that end up feeling like points of comparison, or competition. I guess there has to be some way to assuage your everyday parental anxiety, but I came to see these books as cruel reminders, flip descriptions of what everyone else’s child was doing. I came to resent my own baby books. Growing up, I had always loved to look back at what I did at certain ages, filled out meticulously by my mom. I filled out pages for my first baby, for a while, until the measures for him just didn’t seem right. I completely stopped putting the milestones next to the pictures of duckies when my second son never even met the milestones, months after they were promised to happen. Late bloomer. No, no. No! I was sure it was just a fluke. My own mom had the proof that I was toilet trained by age two. I don’t even remember when my kids were out of diapers. Well, my ten year old still is not. I know, I should know these details. I did keep track of so many things, know some key facts about my children’s development.

Here are a few.

For my older son: Put keys in car ignition properly – age 18 months (after retrieving my missing keys—from his toy tractor)… I would never believe it if I hadn’t been there.

For my younger son: Walked – age 4½ years (after first time riding a horse)

For my older daughter: Crossed the street by herself – age 3 (to visit the dairy cows and pick blackberries)… chased, by me

For my younger daughter: Said first sentence, “I’m the baby.” – age 18 months (and got passed around to every kindergarten mother because she was so cute).

I can also tell you the dates of a few key events for my ten year old. The first EEG, EKG, EMG, the first CAT scan, MRI. Expensive equipment. Mostly nice doctors. But first came the crushing blow. It was on my mom’s birthday. I got home late in the Vermont snow, a lump still in my throat. My son was ten months old, and I had asked the question at six months (“No, he’s healthy—just a late bloomer”), then at nine months (“Maybe you should come back in a month.”). It was a month later. My son had still never rolled over on his own.

“Nothing has changed. He’ll still be able to live at home,” the pediatrician told me before he walked out of the room.

It was only years later that I realized that these were hardly sensitive words. I wanted to know the future, and it was not in the “what to expect” category. He said that nothing had changed. Everything had changed. He said my son could still live at home. I was nowhere near the point of thinking that any of my children would live away from me before they grew up, and this doctor had the nerve to put that thought in my head. How could he give me news like that to share with my mom on her birthday? Saying it to her only made it seem real, and I didn’t even know what he meant by “delayed.” Wasn’t that the same thing he said before? Late bloomer? The next day, I hit the toy stores in search of developmental toys, mirrors. I made the appointments, neurologist, geneticist, had the blood drawn. I discovered the internet. I changed.

It was another year and a half before someone said the word “autism.” I’m still not sure how it fits, but it certainly got everyone’s attention better than “developmental delay.” I signed up for a year of classes–the University of Vermont’s Rural Autism Project probably saved my life. I drove to Montpelier every Wednesday night through every sort of weather, winding through the dark roads late at night, looking for answers, finding myself in the process. I was his mom. I dragged the kids–first just the boys, then another girl, then another–to Burlington every Friday for several years to see the “right” occupational therapist before I found a great one near us. I made friends, connections, went to conferences, read, looked for the cure. “Let Me Hear Your Voice” convinced me that the behavioral program the doctor had recommended in the beginning was the only thing that would save him. With it, he would talk. I wrote letters to important people. I complained. And a year later, when we still did not have those behavioral services, I called a more important meeting, wrote to more important people. My son got his program, and he even said a few words, for a while. Everyone knew my son. He was my cause.

Things continued like this for years, so many things, so many efforts, and still they do. But one day, near the end of a year in a fellowship program that was nearly all inspired by this one child, I realized that I could no longer lift him. I found this out because I could not walk after I tried to do it too many times. Apparently, a lot of other people realized that they could not lift him, either, because it was getting harder and harder to find people to help me. The ones who thought they could were getting hurt, pulled muscles, bite marks, scratches, enough. I missed the people who helped me, helped us. If I think of the amazing people I met, and the experiences I never would have had, I realize how lucky I was… also how selfish. I found my voice in giving it to a boy who does not have one, and now I find myself wondering what to say.

I let my son go physically several months ago–he now lives with his dad–a tough choice in itself (as I wrote here)–though I know his dad loves him. I didn’t want to separate the kids, but what more could I do? It should lead to a better life for him, a better life for his brother, who also needs me to fight for him, a better life for his sisters, who just need me period. A better life for me.

…I think. But what is that life now? I wonder, as I realized the day after that court date, at my son’s annual school review, that I would not be the one signing the individual educational plan. Oh, yes, what I gained in the exchange is precious, necessary perhaps. It lessens the struggle. There really was no choice. But giving up on one son to save another? Oh, yes. My older son needs this now. My older son has bipolar disorder, and walks a perilous labyrinth filled with the dead ends of denial and the land mines of stigma. He can learn to walk that path safely, though–with some help. But now I know I cannot walk it for him. His sisters need me. I need me. But this all sounds so righteous. Really, the best I can hope is that it is right. I make choices for some, for many things, but I have no control over how things turn out. I never did. And really, what did I have then? What do I have now?

“When I let go of what I have, I receive what I need” (Lao Tzu).

I looked at the date today and realized that I have hardly written in the past ten days. It made me wonder. I thought I’d be full of thoughts at this time. True enough, but words just did not come out of them. Sometimes, though, it is hard to put words to things that have not yet started to make sense. My little boy left just a week ago today. All right, he is not little: he is ten years old. He is heavy. He actually is pretty big. And strong. I wrote about him before, anticipating the day. The day came, and I thought I would leave it there, move on. But it has taken a little longer.

I saw my son off last Friday evening, a strange day, but all right. I went briefly to a cookout for his camp. Friends met me later, other moms who have kids like mine, single moms. We said we should have told the waiter that we were exotic dancers on our night off. We did yoga—it’s close, right? I went home, kept busy all weekend, a bit dazed, then came home Sunday. The other kids showed up without their brother.

The quiet in the house at first was a relief. It can be all-consuming to care full-time for someone whose needs are enormous. I had taken it for granted for so long, it was a relief not to have to remember so many details, at least the first night. The next day seemed even quieter, even with the other kids. And the next two, nearly empty. I made enchiladas, one of his favorite meals, and my youngest girl just started crying. This, from the one I had deemed least likely to be upset by the change. Maybe the others were not quite ready to cry yet. Maybe I wasn’t quite ready, either.

Tonight, it feels right. He is here now, visiting for the weekend, thrilled to have risotto (of course I planned the menus thinking of him), and to take a bath. He is making the noise that fills the house, the same noise that in all truth annoyed the hell out of me sometimes, but a true indicator of his presence, sweeter now that I haven’t tried to sleep through it in a few days. Now, on some weekends, he will still come home, and his sounds will fill the house again.

I was not expecting to be hit so hard by his absence. I knew that one day, the needs would be great enough that I could not handle him on a daily basis. Already, it had become nearly impossible to find personal care attendants who were able to do the job. I attributed it at first to a general shortage of workers. There was even legislation passed to help the situation: it must be a big problem. I found thirty-two people to interview, nonetheless, and hired ten. Of those, eight quit before the first day, and I had to fire the other two. Wow. Harder than I thought. I had a great idea during last year’s program in disability policy, finding help for families who need an extra hand to keep the people we love at home. It is a problem, an enormous one, one I felt we could make better. One day, I was speaking with a man who had been involved in the independent living movement for years. Yes, people should be able to live in their community, and should have the supports they need to do so. But sometimes, he said, to my surprise, it is nearly impossible for the community to support everyone. In our case, after the last person left one day, feeling guilty enough that she never came back to say goodbye, I knew that we had reached the end of the line.

Behavioral challenges, safety concerns, limits to mobility, few self-help skills: these were the things I tried to help my son overcome. So many people tried. I miss those people. I miss the smiling young faces who came to teach, to play, to help. I miss the therapists and teachers. I counted once how many people had come into our home to work with my son. At age ten, the number reaches near 100. It may seem hard to believe, but the turnover is enormous for so many reasons. It is a job with a “Puff, the Magic Dragon” quality to it at times. Other times, budgets get cut. Sometimes, people just burn out, and sometimes it is far from pretty. Many times we had three and four people coming to the house on a daily basis. I loved so many people who came into our lives because of my son. He brought people whose capacity for love and patience was greater than I sometimes experienced. It was a thoughtful world, despite the constant fight for the help kids need. I remember each and every one of the people who visited our life—wish I had a picture of all of them. These people became so much a part of the scenery, a difficult relationship to negotiate at times. Professional helpers could not be family, were different from friends. They leave when services end, and yet, they are so much a part of our family, if an indefinable one.

So, some things change. There will still be people who help my son in his school. We will still know them. I do this with the hope that he can have the life he wants, surrounded by people who care about him. It’s nothing more or less than what any parent wants for a child.

I miss him. He is upstairs now, already in bed. It feels right with him here, even for a few days. It is a guilty relief, to know someone else has to do it every day. It will take a little while before it feels right for him to leave, too. It will take some time for this to make sense, but already, knowing that he can come home, already I know that in many ways, he never really will leave.

Life goes on.

Yes, I did note that one of the private things in my life is that I am a one-time horse-owner. I do not recommend it, especially if you feel the least bit intimidated by animals that are bigger than you are.

Forgive me, horse lovers. I have surely hit the nerve of some of you out there. I assure you, I voice my caution with utmost respect and admiration for the equine enthusiast. Indeed, I imagine that it is you, oh horsey friend, who truly understand the care and loving that these animals need.

So how did this all begin?

I was pregnant, pre-doctoral-exam and, looking back, half mad. I had gone from my normal coursework, teaching and student life to pre-mom panic near the hub of the universe. We lived in Brookline. We had just moved from Colorado, and I loved the hustle of the city and the feel of being in the East. But, when prompted sufficiently, I did have to agree that it was sort of noisy, and really expensive. So I entertained the notion of at least looking at houses one day while we were on a little getaway in the Northeast Kingdom. There were some nice houses, much cheaper, of course. Some were on beautiful, quaint commons. Some were in the woods. There was one stunning house, on pavement (as opposed to the ubiquitous dirt roads found in those parts), that just went with the image of canning and berry picking, and drinking tea on the back porch after a satisfying day’s work on a novel I had not started, or even considered writing… I would be embarrassed to admit falling for the whole thing, had not so many others been similarly seduced by this image of bucolic utopia. A few months later, we packed up the new baby and headed for the hills. It was March, and they were snowy hills, I might add. There was a LOT of snow, and it did not melt until May. Late May. It was forty degrees below zero the night after we moved in. Nothing melts when it’s that cold.

Although I found many things to love there, I felt a tad isolated—oh, I can tell more stories about that, too—when I lived in Vermont, and the horses were no help. Mostly, they took a lot of time. Now, you all may assume by reading this that I don’t take well to critters. Not true. When I was little, we fed raccoons in our suburban backyard. I was a big birdwatcher. As for bigger farm animals, as a little girl, I rode horses, albeit cautiously, nearly every time my family went to the country to see my aunt and uncle, about once a month. I was never the horsey girl who was in the equestrian troop of the Girl Scouts or wanted riding boots or read Black Beauty over and over at the age of eight, but it was pretty fun seeing my cousins and riding Dixie. (I also shot at cans with a rifle and drove homemade go carts too fast through the hills, but those are yet more stories for another time.). Dixie was gentle, and fun to groom and feed, and I really liked the barn. And then I went home and didn’t think much about horses. That was my experience with them.

So the question is sure to have come up in your mind by now. Why horses?

Well, the answer is simple. They came with the house.

The house we moved into was beautiful. It had two staircases—a dream I had growing up, because of the house where I used to take piano lessons. Add to that the push-button lights, three huge clawfoot bathtubs, pocket doors, leaded glass, a full walk-in pantry. It was elegant, wonderful inside. And outside were seven acres of perennial gardens on a gentle slope. Around the back was the entrance to the updated stables in the lower level of a three-story barn attached to the house. And there, in the stables, were the horses.

The big Morgan mix was twenty-six years old. Her name was Amber, and she was cranky. I couldn’t say I blamed her. The people who owned the house seemed to love her, and she loved them, and now they were going back to merry old England. The younger one—who turned out not to be that much younger—was named Marc Antony, or Tony for short. Tony the pony. Oh yes, he was a pony, and he was hell on wheels.. ahem, hooves. If Amber did not get out, Tony did. And if Amber did, it was usually because she was worried about Tony, who had already loosened the gate and headed down the field, or possibly the street. Have you ever tried to catch a naughty pony? The normal techniques I tried with cats sometimes worked. Tony liked oats, and occasionally came running if I shook the bag. When that trick failed, though, it was not fun, especially because I was not used to hip-deep snow, ice, and otherwise nasty conditions. So that was it for me. The care and maintenance of beasts, as well as starting the fire in the woodstove, were now in the hands of my then-husband. After nights up nursing, I had a good excuse to sleep in until seven a.m., after all.

There were still many coincidental worries around the animals. We were constantly running out of hay and feed, and the bit about shoeing them was more trouble and expense than I ever could have imagined. We had to lock the oats away from Tony, or he would eat too much and somehow develop founder, which is a scary condition I had never encountered. I felt that we were probably not doing everything quite right, and at best, were not giving the horses the opportunities to pull carts and be otherwise useful and productive. I had the idea that Tony’s shenanigans were as much a statement of boredom as a simple part of his personality.

Still, we kept the horses. I would have given up much sooner. Once, I was on my own for a couple of weeks. I was six months pregnant, had another baby in a backpack, and was shoveling manure. It was not a graceful or comfortable thing to do. In context, though, it did not seem like a big deal. What made it somewhat easier was the fact that many of the people I had met up there were dairy farmers. They were in cold barns working from four in the morning, sometimes with a young child or two in tow, sometimes pregnant, usually tired, and taking care not of pets, but of the animals who were their livelihood. I have never seen anyone work harder. They were often out there for hours later than any normal bedtime, repairing machines, tending sick animals, haying in the summer. I saw their raw hands and red faces, day in and day out, and I couldn’t really find it in myself to complain about a couple of cranky, but somehow amusingly mischievous horses.

Still, it was during my then-husband’s first long motorcycle trip that I realized the horses needed to go. By that time, number three child had arrived, and I realized that my role as a mother was turning into something I had not expected. My second boy’s delays in development across the board were quite evidently not cured by the various therapies I had set up, and a Leo the Late Bloomer scenario was becoming less and less likely. In June, my son was diagnosed with autism.

A neighbor gave me the name of the previous owners of the horses, and I called them. A few days later, they came and took Amber and Tony back to the horse farm where they had lived years before.

Strangely enough, after a couple of years, horses were exactly the thing that gave my son more than any other therapy he has ever had. I have no statistical data to prove this, and it could very well be argued that all the other efforts we had made just came together right then. It did seem like a miracle, though. He learned to walk, then run, after just a few rides on the back of a horse, a very calm horse—well, actually, a pony. I never knew this, but according to the occupational therapist who ran the show, humans ride horses comfortably because our gaits are the same. Horses are therapeutic, she said, because they give the rhythm of walking to those who don’t have it themselves. It seemed to be exactly the case for my son. And the magic continued. He said words he had never said before or since when the rhythm was right on the back of those animals. He smiled when he was riding, and rode on trails for several weeks with his brother one glorious fall.

Now, it takes a special sort of horse to be able to be a therapy horse, and I can tell you right now that Amber and Tony were a little past their prime for that kind of training. One thing was certain, though. I was no longer afraid of big animals. I stayed away from their backsides, more to avoid being kicked or stepped on than anything else, but aside from that, they didn’t scare me anymore. Chasing an ornery pony around the yard in the dead of a cold Vermont winter was a great way to dispel any fear I had.

So, when the time came to put my four-year-old son, who could barely sit up, in the saddle, I handed him over, watched him, and waited. I trusted, watched, waited, much as I do today, and will no doubt continue to do, as his life moves on at a different pace from the lives all around him.